Speech

We have been a leading voice on explaining how government over-regulation of online speech threatens free expression, free association, and the open Internet. We’ve explained how increased, and more arbitrary regulation could chill free speech and increase the ability of politicians to manipulate the media, both old and new.

Select Publication Type

Latest Articles

Article

A Victory for Online & Political Free Speech in Dreamhost Case

WASHINGTON D.C. —Yesterday, in a major victory for online and political free speech, the Chief Judge of the D.C. Superior Court revised an earlier order governing how the Department of Justice can access user data stored by Dreamhost. Judge Morin’s new order allows the web hosting company to protect the identities of innocent political dissidents by redacting the identities of individual users of the anti-Trump website disruptJ20.org before turning over information to DOJ. Before obtaining ...

Graham Owens
October 11, 2017
Article

Judge Orders Dreamhost to Turn Over Entire Domain of Anti-Trump Website

Despite “Efforts” to Minimize Chilling Effect, DoJ’s Warrant Remains Hugely Problematic by Graham Owens If you’ve spoken out against Trump — or if you spoke out against “Emperor” Obama — would you think twice about keeping it up if you knew the White House was building an enemies’ list? Would you feel any more comfortable attending a rally, or organizing behind the scenes, if a judge allowed federal agents access to information about critics of the administration ...

Graham Owens
September 15, 2017
Article

DOJ’s Dreamhost Warrant Violates Fourth Amendment

WASHINGTON D.C. — Web hosting provider Dreamhost is challenging a search warrant obtained by the Department of Justice compelling the disclosure of all “information associated with www.disruptj20.org,” an anti-Trump website that the DOJ claims organized a riot in Washington DC on Inauguration Day. Dreamhost argues the warrant fails the Fourth Amendment’s requirement to “particularly describe the person or place to be searched or seized” because ...

August 17, 2017
Article

Weakening Section 230 Won’t Prevent Sex Trafficking

WASHINGTON D.C. — Today, TechFreedom and the R Street institute led a diverse coalition of public interest groups in expressing concerns over the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017. If enacted, the bill would expand criminal liability for websites regarding illegal sex trafficking on their sites, and amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to allow state prosecutors and civil plaintiffs to take action against website operators. As the coalition ...

August 3, 2017
Article

Congress Must Protect Online Speech from Frivolous Lawsuits

WASHINGTON, DC — Today, TechFreedom and a coalition of free-market groups urged Congress to protect Americans against malicious or frivolous litigation that threatens to stifle free speech and undermine the digital economy. In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, the coalition called for passage of H.R. 2304, the SPEAK FREE Act, which would give defendants across the nation access to a special motion to dismiss SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation). The bill would ...

February 2, 2016
Article

State Lawmakers Again Trying to Justify Video Game Censorship: Berin Szoka in HuffPo

Still smarting from their blow-out loss at the Supreme Court two years ago, state legislators are laying the groundwork for a new push to censor video games. In the Huffington Post, TF President Berin Szoka shows how censorship efforts in Massachusetts (and in Congress) are doomed to fail: This week, TechFreedom joined the National Coalition Against Censorship and four other groups to file comments expressing concerns about legislation proposed in Massachusetts. The bill, ...

November 19, 2013
Article

TechFreedom Condemns AG Proposal to Amend Section 230 Immunity

Today, TechFreedom joined the Center for Democracy and Technology and a bipartisan coalition of advocacy organizations, trade associations, investors, and legal scholars in condemning a recent proposal by 47 state attorneys general to amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. As explained in our recent TechBriefing, current law protects online intermediaries from most liability for user-generated content —  meaning sites like Facebook or YouTube ...

July 31, 2013